The Bioavailability of CHF6563, an Ethanol-Free, Sublingual Neonatal Buprenorphine Formulation: A Bridging Study Conducted in Adults.

OBJECTIVE: Sublingual buprenorphine has demonstrated efficacy for treatment of the neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS), but the current formulation used in clinical practice contains 30% ethanol. Ethanol as a pharmacologically active excipient ideally should be removed from neonatal formulations. The objective of this study was to determine the relative bioavailability of a novel ethanol-free -formulation (CHF6563) compared with the commonly used ethanolic solution in a phase I, open-label, 2-period, -single-dose, crossover study in healthy adults. METHODS: Eighteen adult opioid-naïve volunteers were administered one of the formulations in a randomized crossover treatment. After a 10-day washout period, subjects received the other formulation. Serial blood samples were drawn for pharmacokinetic analysis over 48 hours. RESULTS: The geometric mean ratio (90% CIs) of the ethanol-free buprenorphine solution AUC0-last was 0.80 (0.65-0.99) and Cmax was 0.81 (0.66-0.99) compared with reference ethanolic formulation. The -ethanol-free formulation had a greater degree of intersubject variability than the ethanol-containing -reference formulation (coefficient of variation of 59% vs 31.5%, respectively, for AUC0-last). CONCLUSIONS: In an adult population, a novel ethanol-free formulation of buprenorphine containing widely used excipients demonstrated a slight decrease in bioavailability when compared with an ethanolic solution. These results will inform those seeking to develop ethanol-free pediatric drug formulations.

Serum IL-8 as a Determinant of Response to Phosphodiesterase-4 Inhibition in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Rationale: Phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE4) inhibitors have demonstrated increased efficacy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who had chronic bronchitis or higher blood eosinophil counts. Further characterization of patients who are most likely to benefit is warranted. Objective: To identify determinants of response to the PDE4 inhibitor tanimilast. Methods: A PDE4 gene expression signature in blood was developed by unsupervised clustering of the ECLIPSE study dataset (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT00292552; Gene Expression Omnibus Series ID: GSE76705). The signature was further evaluated using blood and sputum transcriptome data from the BIOMARKER study (NCT03004417; GSE133513), enabling validation of the association between PDE4 signaling and target biomarkers. Predictivity of the associated biomarkers against clinical response was then tested in the phase-2b PIONEER tanimilast study (NCT02986321). Measurements and Main Results: The PDE4 gene expression signature developed in the ECLIPSE dataset classified subgroups of patients associated with different PDE4 signaling in the BIOMARKER cohort with an area under the receiver operator curve of 98%. In the BIOMARKER study, serum IL-8 was the only variable that was consistently associated with PDE4 signaling, with lower levels associated with higher PDE4 activity. In the PIONEER study, the exacerbation rate reduction mediated by tanimilast treatment increased up to twofold in patients with lower IL-8 levels; 36% versus 18%, reaching statistical significance at ⩽20 pg/ml (P = 0.035). The combination with blood eosinophils ⩾150 µl-1 or chronic bronchitis provided further additive exacerbation rate reduction: 45% (P = 0.013) and 47% (P = 0.027), respectively. Conclusions: Using selected heterogeneous datasets, this analysis identifies IL-8 as an independent predictor of PDE4 inhibition, as tanimilast had a greater effect on exacerbation prevention in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who had lower baseline serum IL-8 levels. Testing of this biomarker in other datasets is warranted. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00292552 [Gene Expression Omnibus Series ID: GSE76705], NCT03004417 [GSE133513], and NCT02986321).

A Randomized, Controlled Trial to Investigate the Efficacy of Nebulized Poractant Alfa in Premature Babies with Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of nebulized poractant alfa (at 200 and 400 mg/kg doses) delivered in combination with nasal continuous positive airway pressure compared with nasal continuous positive airway pressure alone in premature infants with diagnosed respiratory distress syndrome. STUDY DESIGN: This randomized, controlled, multinational study was conducted in infants at 280/7 to 326/7 weeks of gestation. The primary outcome was the incidence of respiratory failure in the first 72 hours of life, defined as needing endotracheal surfactant and/or mechanical ventilation owing to prespecified criteria. Secondary outcomes included the time to respiratory failure in the first 72 hours, duration of ventilation, mortality, incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia, and major associated neonatal comorbidities. In addition, the safety and tolerability of the treatments were assessed reporting the number and percentage of infants with treatment-emergent adverse events and adverse drug reactions during nebulization. RESULTS: In total, 129 infants were randomized. No significant differences were observed for the primary outcome: 24 (57%), 20 (49%), and 25 (58%) infants received endotracheal surfactant and/or mechanical ventilation within 72 hours in the poractant alfa 200 mg/kg, poractant alfa 400 mg/kg, and nasal continuous positive airway pressure groups, respectively. Similarly, secondary respiratory outcomes did not differ among groups. Enrollment was halted early owing to a change in the benefit-risk balance of the intervention. Nebulized poractant alfa was well-tolerated and safe, and no serious adverse events were related to the study treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The intervention did not decrease the likelihood of respiratory failure within the first 72 hours of life. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03235986.

A first-in-human clinical study of a new SP-B and SP-C enriched synthetic surfactant (CHF5633) in preterm babies with respiratory distress syndrome: two-year outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To assess at 24 months corrected age (CA) the neurological, respiratory, and general health status of children born prematurely from 27+0 to 33+6 weeks' gestation who were treated in a first-in-human study with a new fully synthetic surfactant (CHF5633) enriched with SP-B and SP-C proteins. OUTCOME MEASURES: Children were assessed using Bayley Scales of Infant Development (BSID), with a score below normal defined as BSID-II Mental Development Index score <70, or BSID-III cognitive composite score <85. In addition, a health status questionnaire was used to check for functional disability including respiratory problems and related treatments, sensory and neurodevelopment assessments, communication skills as well as the number of hospitalizations. RESULTS: 35 of 39 survivors had a neurodevelopmental assessment, 24 infants being evaluated by Bayley's Scales and 11 by health status questionnaires only. 23 children had scores within normal limits and one had BSID-III <85. The remaining 11 were judged clinically to have normal development. Health status questionnaires detected only issues that would normally be expected in preterm-born children. CONCLUSIONS: This assessment offers reassurance that treatment with CHF5633 surfactant was not associated with adverse neurodevelopmental, respiratory, or health outcomes by two years corrected age.

Efficacy and safety of CHF6001, a novel inhaled PDE4 inhibitor in COPD: the PIONEER study.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the efficacy, safety and tolerability of the novel inhaled phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor CHF6001 added-on to formoterol in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS: Randomised, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled, parallel-group study. Eligible patients had symptomatic COPD, post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) 30-70% predicted, and history of ≥1 moderate/severe exacerbation. Patients were randomised to extrafine CHF6001 400, 800, 1200 or 1600 µg twice daily (BID), budesonide, or placebo for 24 weeks. PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: To investigate CHF6001 dose-response for pre-dose FEV1 after 12 weeks, and to identify the optimal dose. Moderate-to-severe exacerbations were a secondary endpoint. RESULTS: Of 1130 patients randomised, 91.9% completed. Changes from baseline in pre-dose FEV1 at Week 12 were small in all groups (including budesonide), with no CHF6001 dose-response, and no significant treatment-placebo differences. For moderate-to-severe exacerbations, CHF6001 rate reductions versus placebo were 13-28% (non-significant). In post-hoc analyses, CHF6001 effects were larger in patients with a chronic bronchitis phenotype (rate reductions versus placebo 24-37%; non-significant), and were further increased in patients with chronic bronchitis and eosinophil count ≥150 cells/µL (49-73%, statistically significant for CHF6001 800 and 1600 µg BID). CHF6001 was well tolerated with no safety signal (including in terms of gastrointestinal adverse events). CONCLUSIONS: CHF6001 had no effect in the primary lung function analysis, although was well-tolerated with no gastrointestinal adverse event signal. Post-hoc analyses focused on exacerbation risk indicate specific patient subgroups who may receive particular benefit from CHF6001. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT02986321 ). Registered 8 Dec 2016.

Synthetic Surfactant CHF5633 Compared with Poractant Alfa in the Treatment of Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare efficacy and safety of a new synthetic surfactant, CHF5633, enriched with surfactant proteins, SP-B and SP-C peptide analogues, with porcine surfactant, poractant alfa, for the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome in infants born preterm. STUDY DESIGN: Neonates born preterm on respiratory support requiring fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) ≥0.30 from 240/7 to 266/7 weeks and FiO2 ≥0.35 from 270/7 to 296/7 weeks of gestation to maintain 88%-95% oxygen saturation were randomized to receive 200 mg/kg of CHF5633 or poractant alfa. If necessary, redosing was given at 100 mg/kg. Efficacy end points were oxygen requirement (FiO2, respiratory severity score [FiO2 × mean airway pressure]) in the first 24 hours, 7 and 28 days, discharge home, and/or 36 weeks of postmenstrual age; mortality and bronchopulmonary dysplasia at 28 days and 36 weeks of PMA. Adverse events and immunogenicity were monitored for safety. RESULTS: Of the 123 randomized neonates, 113 were treated (56 and 57 in CHF5633 and poractant alfa groups, respectively). In both arms, FiO2 and respiratory severity score decreased from baseline at all time points (P < .001) with no statistically significant differences between groups. Rescue surfactant use (19 [33.9%] vs 17 [29.8%]), bronchopulmonary dysplasia (31 [55.4%] and 32 [56.1%]), and mortality at day 28 (4 [7.1%] and 3 [5.3%]) were similar in the CHF5633 and poractant alfa groups, respectively. In 2 (3.4%) and 1 (1.7%) neonates, adverse drug reactions were reported in CHF5633 and poractant alfa groups, respectively. No immunogenicity was detected. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with CHF5633 showed similar efficacy and safety as poractant alfa in neonates born preterm with moderate-to-severe respiratory distress syndrome. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02452476.

Caffeine Citrate for Apnea of Prematurity: A Prospective, Open-Label, Single-Arm Study in Chinese Neonates.

Background: Caffeine citrate has been approved in China for the management of apnea of prematurity. This clinical trial was conducted as a condition of regulatory approval. The aim was to confirm the efficacy of caffeine citrate in the treatment of recurrent intermittent hypoxia and bradycardia in preterm newborns with primary apnea. Objectives: The primary outcome was the change from baseline in the number of apnea events after loading dose administration of caffeine citrate. Secondary efficacy outcomes included the change from baseline in apnea events after 2 and 4 weeks of maintenance doses. Methods: This was a multicenter, prospective longitudinal open-label, single-arm study. Neonates who had experienced at least four apnea events during a 24 h period received a loading dose of caffeine citrate 20 mg/kg; those who required additional maintenance doses received 5 mg/kg/day (titrated up to 10 mg/kg/day in case of insufficient response). The number of apnea events was recorded for 6-12 h prior to the loading dose (baseline), and for 12 h post-dose, following the loading dose and at Weeks 2 and 4 (during maintenance). Results: A total of 247 neonates received the loading dose, who had a significant reduction from baseline of 3.9 events (p < 0.001) in the mean number of apnea events. The subset of neonates who required maintenance doses also had significant reductions in the number of events at all visits (p < 0.001 for all). A total of 79.4% of participants had at least one adverse event, but only one non-serious and no serious events were considered related to treatment. Conclusions: In this large, prospective, open-label study, premature infants with a history of apnea who received caffeine citrate were significantly less likely to experience further apnea events.

Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of single and repeat ascending doses of CHF6001, a novel inhaled phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor: two randomized trials in healthy volunteers.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of CHF6001, an inhaled phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two healthy volunteer, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies were conducted. In each, Part 1 evaluated single ascending doses, with PK sampling up to 48 hours post-dose; Part 2 evaluated multiple ascending doses (Study 1, 7 days; Study 2, 14 days), with PK sampling up to 24 hours post-dose on first and last day of each period. In Study 1, treatments were administered via single-dose dry-powder inhaler (SDDPI; Aerolizer): Part 1, 20, 100, 200, 400, 800, 1,600, and 2,000 µg or placebo; Part 2, 100, 300, 600, 1,200, and 1,600 µg or placebo once daily (OD). In Study 2, treatments were administered via multi-dose dry-powder inhaler (MDDPI; NEXThaler): Part 1, 2,400, 4,000, and 4,800 µg or placebo; Part 2, 1,200, 2,000, or 2,400 µg twice daily (BID) or placebo. Modeling and simulation then compared OD and BID dosing via MDDPI. RESULTS: There was a clear correlation between CHF6001 dose and plasma concentration, following single and multiple doses and using SDDPI and MDDPI. CHF6001 plasma concentration area under the curve (AUC) was dose proportional, with steady state slopes of the fitted line of 0.95 (90% CI: 0.86, 1.04) for AUC0-24 h in Study 1, and 0.85 (90% CI: 0.38, 1.32) for AUC0-12 h in Study 2. Bioavailability was30% higher with MDDPI than SDDPI. The PK simulation confirmed dose proportionality; the same total daily dose OD or BID via MDDPI resulted in similar 24 hours exposure, with BID dosing providing smaller fluctuation and lower maximum concentration. CHF6001 was well tolerated with no relationship between dose and adverse events. CONCLUSION: CHF6001 demonstrated a good safety profile. There was a clear dose proportionality for systemic exposure, with higher bioavailability via MDDPI, suggesting that the MDDPI provides better pulmonary drug deposition. BID dosing was associated with a better exposure profile.

Dose-response of an extrafine dry powder inhaler formulation of glycopyrronium bromide: randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study (GlycoNEXT).

Introduction: An extrafine formulation of the long-acting muscarinic antagonist, glycopyrronium bromide (GB), has been developed for delivery via the NEXThaler dry powder inhaler (DPI). This study assessed the bronchodilator efficacy and safety of different doses of this formulation in patients with COPD to identify the optimal dose for further development. Patients and methods: This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, incomplete block, three-way crossover study, including three 28-day treatment periods, each separated by a 21-day washout period. Eligible patients had a diagnosis of COPD and post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) 40%-70% predicted. Treatments administered were GB 6.25, 12.5, 25 and 50 µg or matched placebo; all were given twice daily (BID) via DPI, with spirometry assessed on Days 1 and 28 of each treatment period. The primary end point was FEV1 area under the curve from 0 to 12 h (AUC0-12 h) on Day 28. Results: A total of 202 patients were randomized (61% male, mean age 62.6 years), with 178 (88%) completing all the three treatment periods. For the primary end point, all the four GB doses were superior to placebo (p<0.001) with mean differences (95% CI) of 114 (74, 154), 125 (85, 166), 143 (104, 183) and 187 (147, 228) mL for GB 6.25, 12.5, 25 and 50 µg BID, respectively. All four GB doses were also statistically superior to placebo for all secondary efficacy end points, showing clear dose-response relationships for most of the endpoints. Accordingly, GB 25 µg BID met the criteria for the minimally acceptable dose. Adverse events were reported by 15.5, 16.2, 10.9 and 14.3% of patients receiving GB 6.25, 12.5, 25 and 50 µg BID, respectively, and 14.8% receiving placebo. Conclusion: This study supports the selection of GB 25 µg BID as the minimal effective dose for patients with COPD when delivered with this extrafine DPI formulation.

Five-country manikin study found that neonatologists preferred using the LISAcath rather than the Angiocath for less invasive surfactant administration.

AIM: Less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) has been shown to decrease the risk of death and bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm neonates. The LISAcath is the first catheter to be specifically developed for LISA, and we compared the clinical impressions of neonatologists using the LISAcath and the commonly used Angiocath in a simulated setting. METHODS: This was a multinational, multicentre study, conducted in October 2016, which involved 39 neonatologists who were recruited by employees of the sponsor from large, well-recognised neonatal intensive care units across Europe. LISA was not the standard of care in these units in Austria, Belgium, Poland, Spain and the United Kingdom at the time of the study. After training, participants simulated LISA on a neonatal manikin, once with the LISAcath and once with Angiocath, then answered a 10-item questionnaire. RESULTS: The responses to nine of 10 questions showed that 67-95% of the respondents preferred the LISAcath to the Angiocath, with most of the remainder indicating no preference. The only exception was the luer connection question, with two-thirds expressing no preference. The LISAcath was considered potentially safer by 33 of 39 participants, with no votes for the Angiocath. CONCLUSION: Overall, neonatologists preferred using the LISAcath rather than the Angiocath on a neonatal manikin.

A first-in-human clinical study of a new SP-B and SP-C enriched synthetic surfactant (CHF5633) in preterm babies with respiratory distress syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: CHF5633 (Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A., Parma, Italy) is the first fully synthetic surfactant enriched by peptide analogues of two human surfactant proteins. We planned to assess safety and tolerability of CHF5633 and explore preliminary efficacy. DESIGN: Multicentre cohort study. PATIENTS: Forty infants from 27+0 to 33+6 weeks gestation with respiratory distress syndrome requiring fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) ≥0.35 were treated with a single dose of CHF5633 within 48 hours after birth. The first 20 received 100 mg/kg and the second 20 received 200 mg/kg. OUTCOME MEASURES: Adverse events (AEs) and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were monitored with complications of prematurity considered AEs if occurring after dosing. Systemic absorption and immunogenicity were assessed. Efficacy was assessed by change in FiO2 after dosing and need for poractant-alfa rescue. RESULTS: Rapid and sustained improvements in FiO2 were observed in 39 (98%) infants. One responded neither to CHF5633 nor two poractant-alfa doses. A total of 79 AEs were experienced by 19 infants in the 100 mg/kg cohort and 53 AEs by 20 infants in the 200 mg/kg cohort. Most AEs were expected complications of prematurity. Two unrelated serious AEs occurred in the second cohort. One infant died of necrotising enterocolitis and another developed viral bronchiolitis after discharge. The single ADR was an episode of transient endotracheal tube obstruction following a 200 mg/kg dose. Neither systemic absorption, nor antibody development to either peptide was detected. CONCLUSIONS: Both CHF5633 doses were well tolerated and showed promising clinical efficacy profile. These encouraging data provide a basis for ongoing randomised controlled trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01651637.

Long-term efficacy and safety of aerosolized tobramycin 300 mg/4 ml in cystic fibrosis.

INTRODUCTION: Aerosolized tobramycin is a standard of care for chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Pa) infection in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). OBJECTIVES: The long-term safety and efficacy of intermittent (28-day "on"/"off" cycles) inhaled tobramycin nebulization solution 300 mg/4 ml (TNS4, Bramitob(®)/Bethkis(®)) was assessed over 56 weeks in CF patients aged ≥6 years having baseline 1 sec forced expiratory volume (FEV(1)) 40-80% predicted. METHODS: Patients were initially randomized in an 8-week open-label trial (core phase) to compare TNS4 (N = 159) and tobramycin 300 mg/5 ml (TNS5, TOBI(®)) (N = 165). A subset of patients continued in a 48-week, single-arm extension receiving TNS4 only. The primary endpoint of the core phase was to demonstrate the non-inferiority of TNS4 compared to TNS5 in terms of absolute change from baseline to week 4 in FEV(1) % predicted. The assessment of long-term safety was the primary purpose of the extension phase. Throughout all phases of the study, microbiological assessments, adverse events, and audiometry findings were also evaluated. RESULTS: In the core phase (N = 321), FEV(1) (% predicted) increased from baseline (absolute change) following a single on-treatment cycle for both TNS4 (7.0%) and TNS5 (7.5%) and the non-inferiority between treatments was met [difference between treatments of -0.5 (95% CI: -2.6; 1.6)]. These improvements were maintained throughout the extension phase (N = 209), ranging throughout the study between 5.1% (95% CI: 3.2; 6.9) and 8.1% (95% CI: 6.8; 9.4) compared to baseline. Pa sputum count reductions ranged between 0.6 (95% CI: 0.2; 0.9) to 2.3 (95% CI: 2.0; 2.6) log10 CFU/g throughout the 56 weeks. No remarkable safety issues were identified throughout both study phases, with similar percentages of patients reporting adverse events in the two treatment groups during the 8-week core phase [TNS4 (31.4%); TNS5 (28.0%)]. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, TNS4 demonstrated short-term clinical benefits similar to TNS5 which were maintained during the long-term use of TNS4 and was also associated with a favorable tolerability profile.

Netilmicin/dexamethasone fixed combination in the treatment of conjunctival inflammation.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of 0.1% dexamethasone/0.3% netilmicin (Netildex), with that of 0.1% dexamethasone/0.3% tobramycin (Tobradex) in the treatment of external ocular inflammation requiring antibiotic therapy. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind study, 139 subjects with conjunctival inflammation associated with signs of ocular infection were treated with Netildex (n = 71) or Tobradex (n = 68) four times daily for 6 days. The primary efficacy analysis was based on the percentage of patients with at least a 50% decrease in conjunctival hyperemia at the endpoint visit (Day 6 [± 1]) with respect to baseline (responder rate). An equivalence margin of 20% was set for this study. A follow-up visit was performed at Day 14 (± 1). Other efficacy parameters were: conjunctival edema, conjunctival discharge, lid hyperemia, lid edema, presence of ocular infection, and symptoms of ocular discomfort. Safety evaluations included intraocular pressure, visual acuity, and adverse events. RESULTS: At Day 6, a decrease of conjunctival hyperemia was observed in 87.3% and 90.9% of the patients treated with Netildex and Tobradex, respectively. The 95% confidence interval for the difference between groups (-15.3 ÷ 8.0) satisfied the equivalence hypothesis. Subjects treated with Netildex had a better control of lid hyperemia (P = 0.016), tearing (P = 0.001), burning (P = 0.007), and stinging (P = 0.004). No adverse reactions were observed during the study except one case of keratitis in the Tobradex group. CONCLUSION: Netildex was as effective and safe as Tobradex in reducing signs and symptoms in patients with conjunctival inflammation when ocular infection was suspected.

Pharmacokinetic and tolerability profiles of tobramycin nebuliser solution 300 mg/4 ml administered by PARI eFlow(®) rapid and PARI LC Plus(®) nebulisers in cystic fibrosis patients.

BACKGROUND: Tobramycin nebuliser solution (TNS) is indicated for maintenance therapy in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients with chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) infections. Adherence to recommended therapy in CF has always been a challenge and new generation nebulisers are increasingly used "off label" to reduce the time required for inhalation, potentially improving patient compliance. METHODS: In this open-label, randomised, multi-centre, two-period crossover study, 27 CF patients with PA infection received TNS 300 mg/4 mL (TNS4) via the PARI eFlow(®) rapid or PARI LC Plus(®) nebuliser twice daily for 28 days in two study periods separated by a 4-week washout. The pharmacokinetic profile in plasma and sputum were determined after single and multiple dose administration on Day 1 and Day 28, respectively. Nebulisation times and general safety and tolerability profiles were evaluated throughout the study. RESULTS: Plasma tobramycin pharmacokinetic profiles were similar for the eFlow and LC Plus nebulisers both on Day 1 and Day 28. After multiple dose administration for 28 days, the eFlow/LC Plus ratio of geometric means for plasma C(max) and AUC(0-t), were 85.32 (90% CI, 61.24-118.86) and 87.44 (90% CI, 64.87-117.87), respectively. Despite the high variability, sputum tobramycin C(max) and AUC(0-t) for the eFlow on Day 28 tended to be higher than for the LC Plus (90% CI for the ratio, 86.11-226.45 and 81.81-236.71), respectively. Nebulisation times were significantly shorter for the eFlow with a median time for nebulisation of 5 min in comparison to 13 min for the LC Plus. Safety data confirmed a favourable safety profile for TNS4, with the majority of the findings being related to the underlying CF disease. CONCLUSIONS: Plasma and sputum pharmacokinetic data in CF patients with chronic PA infection support comparable pulmonary delivery and safety of TNS4 administered using different nebulisers, with a significantly shorter nebulisation time for the eFlow.

A new eye gel containing sodium hyaluronate and xanthan gum for the management of post-traumatic corneal abrasions.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of an ophthalmic gel containing sodium hyaluronate and xanthan gum in addition to the antibiotic netilmicin in the management of traumatic corneal abrasions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: PATIENTS WITH TRAUMATIC CORNEAL ABRASIONS WERE RANDOMLY TREATED AS FOLLOWS: Group A (n = 20) with an occlusive patching for 12 hours plus one drop of an eye gel containing 0.15% sodium hyaluronate, 1% xanthan gum and 0.3% netilmicin qid for 5 days; and Group B (n = 20) with an occlusive patching for 2-3 days plus one application of 0.3% netilmicin ophthalmic ointment qid for 5 days. All patients were evaluated after the third and seventh day by slit-lamp examination, fluorescein staining, and corneal defect photograph in order to assess corneal re-epithelialization. Conjunctival hyperaemia, lid oedema, subjective symptoms of discomfort, and conjunctival swabs were also evaluated. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was observed between the groups in terms of the extent of corneal healing after 3 days of treatment. Both treatments were also highly effective in decreasing the erosion score and the conjunctival hyperemia (P < 0.0001, P < 0.005, respectively) without any significant difference between the two types of treatment. Subjective symptoms of discomfort and conjunctival swabs were also evaluated. CONCLUSION: In the management of traumatic corneal abrasions, the administration of an eye gel containing sodium hyaluronate and xanthan gum is able to reduce the length of occlusive patching. In addition, the presence of netilmicin guarantees good antibiotic prophylaxis during the wound repair process.